Next, we planned more interlinking more localized neighbourhoods by utilizing state-of-the-art generative systems to inform spacing, orientation, and packing, of central courtyards / courtyard pathways, and the clusters/ clustering/neighbouring of these better-informed/performing modular forms. By setting some more conditions, like courtyards and courtyard exterior sides, elevator/stair cores, and living area cores, residents would possess the ability to select their own specific programmatic desires expressed by what modular forms they add to their living cores — and connect/disconnect them as their needs shift. Now, they could realistically define for themselves a localized / hyper-localized neighbourhood by utilizing architecture and architectural form as a tool.

For example, most families in public housing in the site area generally have three generations living under one roof. More qualitatively, most people noted that they disliked how their quality of life had worsened by what different generations do at different hours of the day — and how these hours are always changing as different generations age/grow. With that noted, we started hybridizing these modular forms to either bring together or separate generations however they desired at any time. The surveys allowed us to write, formally, narratives for how different people would live their best lives. Architecturally, we test these narratives in plan, so we started developing plans.